Taken from the roll call in the town’s own minutes. The minutes record who was not there and almost never why.
What was decided (6 motions)
5 carried, 1 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.
That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved. Yeas (4): Mayor Mrakas, Councillor Gaertner, Councillor Thompson, and Councillor Gallo Absent (3): Councillor Kim, Councillor Humfryes, and Councillor Gilliland
Moved by Councillor Thompson, seconded by Councillor Gallo
Carried
In favour (4): Mayor Mrakas, Councillor Gaertner, Councillor Thompson, Councillor Gallo
1. That Report No. PDS22-083 be received; and 2. That the comments presented at the Public Planning meeting be addressed by Planning and Development Services in a report to a future Public Planning meeting. Yeas (6): Mayor Mrakas, Councillor Kim, Councillor Gaertner, Councillor Humfryes, Councillor Thompson, and Councillor Gallo Absent (1): Councillor Gilliland
Moved by Councillor Humfryes, seconded by Councillor Thompson
Carried
In favour (6): Mayor Mrakas, Councillor Kim, Councillor Gaertner, Councillor Humfryes, Councillor Thompson, Councillor Gallo
1. That Report No. PDS22-098 be received; and 2. That the comments presented at the Public Planning meeting be addressed by Planning and Development Services in a report to a future Public Planning meeting. Yeas (2): Mayor Mrakas, and Councillor Thompson Nays (4): Councillor Kim, Councillor Gaertner, Councillor Humfryes, and Councillor Gallo Absent (1): Councillor Gilliland
Moved by Councillor Thompson, seconded by Councillor Humfryes
Defeated
In favour (2): Mayor Mrakas, Councillor Thompson · Opposed (4): Councillor Kim, Councillor Gaertner, Councillor Humfryes, Councillor Gallo
1. That the applications for Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment regarding 1289 Wellington Street East be refused as the proposed development does not conform to the Town’s Official Plan, OPA 30, York Region's Official Plan, and the Provincial Policy Statement, for reasons including, but not limited to, the following: a. The proposed development does not demonstrate there would be no negative impacts on environmental features; and b. The proposed density is not appropriate for the site; and c. There are significant issues with the MCR process and the land conversion from employment to non-employment. Yeas (6): Mayor Mrakas, Councillor Kim, Councillor Gaertner, Councillor Humfryes, Councillor Thompson, and Councillor Gallo Absent (1): Councillor Gilliland
Moved by Councillor Gaertner, seconded by Councillor Gallo
Carried
In favour (6): Mayor Mrakas, Councillor Kim, Councillor Gaertner, Councillor Humfryes, Councillor Thompson, Councillor Gallo
That the confirming by-law be enacted.
Moved by Councillor Thompson, seconded by Councillor Humfryes
Carried
That the meeting be adjourned at 11:30 p.m.
Moved by Councillor Thompson, seconded by Councillor Kim